和平讨论啊。
我们理解：
第1步，要确认责任方和承担方，
第2步，谈是否赔偿及基础方案，
第3步，才是百分比等等赔偿方案细节。而不是说现在就匆匆忙忙进入细节。
就像团队现在主要工作方向是黑客追踪及审计，而不是匆匆忙忙来和社区沟通一样，每一步都要尽量稳重，而不是试图跳跃几步到下一阶段。
我们理解：
第一责任方是黑客犯罪，
第二责任方是mgp团队失职。
如果不能就责任方达成一致，可以先讨论透彻。达成一致，则进入下一步骤。
下面讨论基准方案：
赔偿主体只能是mgp，任何在方案里定义penpie为赔偿主体的，无论方案看起来多么对pnp社区有利，都在基准上出了问题。
名不正则言不顺，pnp社区不能糊里糊涂的背上奇奇怪怪的责任，继遭遇不可抗力灾难之后，再惨遭pua。
没有理由说，因为pnp社区仅仅因为离地震比较近，就要负责赔偿不可抗力天灾的损失。
也许有人会说：因不可抗力造成的天灾损失，pnp社区只能自认倒霉。那么团队可以把这一套天灾理论来向受损lp用户宣贯，看看他们是否愿意自认倒霉。如果能够沟通成功，那就太好了。
如果没有把握向受损lp用户沟通成功的话，为何要来向pnp社区推销这套理论呢？仅仅因为pnp社区比较积极配合，愿意提供帮助团队吗？
好人就该被拿枪指着吗？
Pnp社区比较能接受的方案是：
-
M gp团队作为主责方之一，先把责任担起来，200万个mgp也就是14万美元，不足以宣告这一诚意。
-
如果要社区协助，pnp，ckp等等，所有社区的协助比例应该是一样的，而这个协助需要团队去向各社区沟通解决。
而不是说由于地震发生在pn p这里，就要pnp负担更多的责任。如果是这套天灾理论的话，麻烦把这套天灾理论去向受损lp用户说，看看他们是否能接受，而不是来pua愿意帮助团队的pnp社区。
好人，不该被拿枪指着。
Let’s discuss peacefully.
We understand:
The first step is to confirm the responsible party and the party responsible,
The second step is to discuss whether to compensate and the basic plan,
The third step is the percentage and other details of the compensation plan. Instead of rushing into the details now.
Just like the team’s main work direction now is hacker tracking and auditing, rather than rushing to communicate with the community, each step should be as steady as possible, rather than trying to jump a few steps to the next stage.
We understand:
The first responsible party is the hacker crime,
The second responsible party is the MGP team’s dereliction of duty.
If you can’t reach an agreement on the responsible party, you can discuss it thoroughly first. If you reach an agreement, go to the next step.
Let’s discuss the benchmark plan:
The compensation subject can only be MGP. Anyone who defines penpie as the compensation subject in the plan, no matter how beneficial the plan seems to be to the PNP community, has a problem in the benchmark.
If the name is not right, the words will not flow. The PNP community cannot be confused and bear strange responsibilities. After encountering force majeure disasters, it will be miserable. PUA.
There is no reason to say that the PNP community should be responsible for compensating for the losses caused by force majeure natural disasters just because it is close to the earthquake.
Some people may say: The PNP community can only admit that they are unlucky for the losses caused by natural disasters due to force majeure. Then the team can promote this set of natural disaster theories to the affected LP users to see if they are willing to admit that they are unlucky. If the communication is successful, that would be great.
If you are not sure that you can successfully communicate with the affected LP users, why should you promote this theory to the PNP community? Just because the PNP community is more actively cooperating and willing to help the team?
Should good people be pointed at with guns?
The solution that the PNP community can accept is:
-
As one of the main responsible parties, the MGP team should take the responsibility first. 2 million MGPs, or 140,000 US dollars, is not enough to declare this sincerity.
-
If community assistance is required, PNP, CKP, etc., the assistance ratio of all communities should be the same, and this assistance requires the team to communicate with each community to resolve.
Instead of saying that because the earthquake happened here, PNP should bear more responsibility. If it is this natural disaster theory, please tell this natural disaster theory to the affected LP users to see if they can accept it, instead of pua the PNP community that is willing to help the team.
Good people should not be pointed at with guns.
目前团队可以协调的社区一共有3个，其基本态度在这几天的讨论里展示如下：
lp用户：
d90c为代表的lp用户这几天来到 Telegram中文群，发出声音，其基本诉求是要求赔偿，要求每年赔偿，可以购买一定的pnp来投票。
这一部分用户需要沟通，基本沟通方向可以是借市场流动性力量发债化债，拉长还债周期，也可以是其他方向。
pnp社区：
虽然声音复杂，但已经展示出了很大的诚意，愿意和团队一起共渡难关。
这并非套话，而是因为购买pnp及锁仓vlpnp这个动作本身就是大筛选器，通过了这个筛选的人才会成为pnp社区，那它自然就是天然的整体展示出对团队的信任和好感，以及愿意帮助团队。
这几天pnp社区的讨论不是集中在是否还债，而是集中在如何还债，且有初步提案给出，这说明了pnp社区的道德水准及能力。
但社区展示的善意不是持续被剥削的理由，如果要还债的话，应该是所有子道社区相同比例，不应因为不可抗力灾难发生在某处，就持续剥削某处。比如某地发生了地震，难道不应该各方救援该地，而应该持续剥削该地更多？
其他子道用户：
基本态度是，干脆赖账，如果要还债就别来沾边我们。
这个态度也很好理解，站在自己的利益立场上，且目光较为短浅，这部分人需要mgp团队通过耐心细致的沟通和其他手段来说服，和mgp团队一起共度难关。
At present, there are 3 communities that the team can coordinate. Their basic attitudes are shown in the discussions in the past few days as follows:
lp users:
lp users represented by d90c have come to the Telegram Chinese group in the past few days to make their voices heard. Their basic demands are to demand compensation, and they demand compensation every year. They can buy a certain amount of pnp to vote.
This part of users needs to communicate. The basic communication direction can be to use the market liquidity to issue bonds to convert debts, extend the debt repayment cycle, or other directions.
pnp community:
Although the voices are complicated, they have shown great sincerity and are willing to overcome difficulties with the team.
This is not a cliché, but because the action of buying pnp and locking vlpnp is itself a big filter. Only those who pass this filter will become pnp communities, and then it is naturally a natural overall display of trust and goodwill for the team, as well as willingness to help the team.
The discussion in the pnp community in the past few days is not focused on whether to repay the debt, but on how to repay the debt, and there are preliminary proposals, which shows the moral standards and capabilities of the pnp community.
But the goodwill shown by the community is not a reason to continue to be exploited. If the debt is to be repaid, it should be the same proportion for all Zidao communities. We should not continue to exploit a certain place just because a force majeure disaster occurs in a certain place. For example, if an earthquake occurs in a certain place, shouldn’t all parties rescue the place, but continue to exploit the place more?
Other Zidao users:
The basic attitude is to simply default on the debt. If you want to repay the debt, don’t get involved with us.
This attitude is also easy to understand. Standing on their own interests and with a short-sighted vision, these people need the mgp team to persuade them through patient and meticulous communication and other means to overcome difficulties together with the mgp team.
